The dynamics of the Euro-Mediterranean labour market continue to reflect persistent gender inequalities, evident in participation rates, employment outcomes, and job quality. Despite some cyclical improvements, these disparities remain deeply structural. The challenges are particularly acute in the Middle East and North Africa. Occupational segmentation and sectoral segregation further constrain the effective utilisation of female human capital. This underscores the need for integrated, long-term policy frameworks aimed at advancing inclusion and ensuring sustainable development.
The analysis examines the labour market through indicators of participation, employment and sectoral distribution by gender, providing a comparative reading of employment dynamics and gender inequalities across different geographical contexts.
Labor force participation rate for ages 15-24, female (%) (modeled ILO estimate)
Labor force participation rate for ages 15-24, male (%) (modeled ILO estimate)
Labor force participation rate, female (% of female population ages 15-64) (modeled ILO estimate)
Labor force participation rate, male (% of male population ages 15-64) (modeled ILO estimate)
Employment to population ratio, ages 15-24, female (%) (modeled ILO estimate)
Employment to population ratio, ages 15-24, male (%) (modeled ILO estimate)
Employment to population ratio, 15+, female (%) (modeled ILO estimate)
Employment to population ratio, 15+, male (%) (modeled ILO estimate)
Unemployment, female (% of female labor force) (modeled ILO estimate)
Unemployment, male (% of male labor force) (modeled ILO estimate)
Self-employed, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
Self-employed, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
Wage and salaried workers, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
Wage and salaried workers, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
Employers, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
Employers, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
Employment in agriculture, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
Employment in agriculture, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
Employment in industry, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
Employment in industry, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
Employment in services, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
Employment in services, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
area_code
ordgeo
Countries
2024
2024
2024
2024
2024
2024
2024
2024
2024
2024
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
Portugal
33.5
37.2
75.7
80.0
26.6
29.2
50.9
59.2
6.9
5.9
11.5
17.5
88.5
82.5
2.9
6.4
1.7
4.1
15.8
33.9
82.5
62.0
A
1
Spain
30.9
35.1
70.6
78.5
22.4
25.8
45.7
56.2
12.7
9.9
11.7
18.1
88.3
81.9
3.3
6.1
1.9
5.1
9.1
29.1
88.9
65.9
A
2
France
40.2
45.0
71.1
76.6
33.8
37.4
47.9
55.2
7.2
7.4
10.2
15.5
89.8
84.5
2.9
6.7
1.6
3.4
9.8
28.2
88.6
68.4
A
3
Italy
19.4
29.7
57.5
75.6
15.1
24.0
38.4
55.3
7.3
5.9
16.1
25.2
83.9
74.8
3.8
8.0
2.2
4.6
13.8
36.1
84.0
59.3
A
4
Slovenia
32.9
38.4
73.4
79.8
30.3
34.3
51.4
61.4
4.0
3.2
10.2
17.7
89.8
82.3
1.8
5.2
3.4
4.6
18.4
43.7
78.3
51.7
A
5
Croatia
25.0
37.0
66.5
73.4
20.4
31.2
44.4
54.9
5.0
4.8
9.1
17.4
90.9
82.6
3.3
7.6
3.3
5.9
15.3
38.3
81.5
55.8
A
6
Greece
23.3
27.0
62.1
76.7
17.1
20.7
38.7
54.7
12.7
7.8
25.0
35.5
75.0
64.5
4.2
9.6
9.8
12.7
8.1
21.9
82.1
65.3
A
7
Malta
52.3
57.3
73.4
87.3
49.3
51.8
53.8
69.6
3.0
2.7
10.9
18.2
89.1
81.8
1.8
5.6
0.4
1.6
8.6
24.0
91.0
74.3
A
8
Cyprus
42.8
45.0
75.4
84.2
36.9
37.2
58.8
69.1
5.1
5.5
8.7
12.0
91.3
88.0
1.1
2.4
0.8
3.7
7.0
24.1
92.2
72.2
A
9
Serbia
26.1
39.6
66.1
79.1
19.8
31.0
46.0
60.9
7.4
7.0
23.9
29.8
76.1
70.2
1.9
4.4
18.7
19.5
19.8
35.4
61.5
45.1
B
10
Kosovo
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
17.8
10.6
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
B
11
Bosnia and Herzegovina
18.4
32.8
52.3
73.5
12.7
24.5
34.3
54.9
12.0
9.1
26.4
20.1
73.6
79.9
2.2
5.1
22.8
13.9
15.8
41.1
61.4
45.0
B
12
Montenegro
23.7
33.6
53.4
66.4
18.1
24.4
36.1
47.0
14.6
15.3
12.7
24.0
87.3
76.0
2.1
4.4
5.1
6.8
6.1
24.8
88.8
68.4
B
13
North Macedonia
20.5
35.7
54.2
77.8
13.9
25.3
36.6
54.6
11.0
14.3
11.3
19.3
88.7
80.7
3.4
7.9
8.1
10.2
25.2
33.8
66.8
56.0
B
14
Albania
27.0
39.7
64.6
79.7
19.7
30.2
47.9
61.3
11.3
10.0
51.1
53.4
48.9
46.6
1.6
6.1
39.9
30.8
16.7
24.8
43.4
44.4
B
15
Turkiye
33.7
58.0
41.5
78.1
26.5
50.8
32.2
66.4
11.8
6.9
27.5
29.1
72.5
70.8
1.7
6.1
18.5
12.8
18.1
32.2
63.4
55.0
C
16
Syrian Arab Republic
9.2
40.7
14.2
65.3
4.8
29.4
10.1
56.3
24.9
10.4
10.7
38.8
89.3
61.2
0.3
1.4
8.2
16.3
6.2
24.7
85.7
59.0
C
17
Lebanon
25.7
44.5
31.4
71.5
20.0
33.7
23.4
58.8
14.7
10.0
15.6
35.7
84.5
64.3
3.3
11.2
1.4
4.3
6.3
26.4
92.3
69.2
C
18
Jordan
9.7
37.4
15.0
64.8
5.0
22.5
10.2
51.3
26.1
16.2
4.9
13.0
95.1
87.0
1.6
3.6
1.0
3.6
6.9
20.5
92.1
75.9
C
19
Israel
46.9
46.5
72.4
75.1
44.1
43.6
60.1
66.0
3.6
3.1
8.6
14.6
91.4
85.4
1.6
5.7
0.4
1.1
7.5
23.2
92.1
75.7
C
20
West Bank and Gaza
10.9
51.1
20.1
75.3
4.7
35.0
11.4
57.6
30.1
20.2
22.9
24.0
77.1
76.0
2.0
6.1
6.3
6.2
9.6
37.3
84.1
56.5
C
21
Egypt, Arab Rep.
8.2
35.4
16.3
73.5
4.4
31.0
12.4
66.5
18.3
4.9
27.9
25.8
72.1
74.2
1.2
3.1
16.8
19.1
8.5
32.4
74.8
48.6
D
22
Libya
10.5
23.9
35.5
67.1
3.3
14.0
24.7
53.5
24.2
15.5
8.7
18.0
91.3
82.0
1.5
2.6
6.9
9.5
9.2
29.5
83.8
61.0
D
23
Tunisia
14.6
31.6
30.5
72.5
9.1
18.6
20.8
56.4
20.8
13.8
15.8
29.3
84.2
70.7
3.0
8.0
9.2
14.3
32.3
33.7
58.5
52.0
D
24
Algeria
7.3
37.8
15.5
72.3
4.0
27.6
11.1
60.2
20.5
9.5
25.1
33.3
74.9
66.7
1.9
5.1
3.2
10.4
22.9
32.2
73.9
57.4
D
25
Morocco
12.3
40.5
21.2
73.6
9.6
31.6
17.5
62.6
10.6
8.5
24.9
44.1
75.1
55.9
2.9
4.6
47.5
24.6
13.8
27.0
38.7
48.4
D
26
Labor force participation rate for ages 15-24, female (%) (modeled ILO estimate)
KosovoNo data available
West Bank and GazaLatest available data: 2022
Labor force participation rate for ages 15-24, male (%) (modeled ILO estimate)
KosovoNo data available
West Bank and GazaLatest available data: 2022
Labor force participation rate, female (% of female population ages 15-64) (modeled ILO estimate)
KosovoNo data available
LebanonLatest available data: 2023
West Bank and GazaLatest available data: 2022
Labor force participation rate, male (% of male population ages 15-64) (modeled ILO estimate)
KosovoNo data available
LebanonLatest available data: 2023
West Bank and GazaLatest available data: 2022
Employment to population ratio, ages 15-24, female (%) (modeled ILO estimate)
KosovoNo data available
West Bank and GazaLatest available data: 2022
Employment to population ratio, ages 15-24, male (%) (modeled ILO estimate)
KosovoNo data available
West Bank and GazaLatest available data: 2022
Employment to population ratio, 15+, female (%) (modeled ILO estimate)
KosovoNo data available
West Bank and GazaLatest available data: 2022
Employment to population ratio, 15+, male (%) (modeled ILO estimate)
KosovoNo data available
West Bank and GazaLatest available data: 2022
Unemployment, female (% of female labor force) (modeled ILO estimate)
KosovoLatest available data: 2023
Unemployment, male (% of male labor force) (modeled ILO estimate)
KosovoLatest available data: 2022
West Bank and GazaLatest available data: 2022
Self-employed, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
KosovoNo data available
West Bank and GazaLatest available data: 2022
Self-employed, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
KosovoNo data available
West Bank and GazaLatest available data: 2022
Wage and salaried workers, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
KosovoNo data available
West Bank and GazaLatest available data: 2022
Wage and salaried workers, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
KosovoNo data available
West Bank and GazaLatest available data: 2022
Employers, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
KosovoNo data available
West Bank and GazaLatest available data: 2022
Employers, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
KosovoNo data available
West Bank and GazaLatest available data: 2022
Employment in agriculture, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
KosovoNo data available
West Bank and GazaLatest available data: 2022
Employment in agriculture, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
KosovoNo data available
West Bank and GazaLatest available data: 2022
Employment in industry, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
KosovoNo data available
West Bank and GazaLatest available data: 2022
Employment in industry, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
KosovoNo data available
West Bank and GazaLatest available data: 2022
Employment in services, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
KosovoNo data available
West Bank and GazaLatest available data: 2022
Employment in services, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
KosovoNo data available
West Bank and GazaLatest available data: 2022
Some highlighted topics
Based on data updated to 2024, the Mediterranean labour market shows only limited cyclical improvements, which do not translate into a structural strengthening of female participation. Gender gaps remain wide, particularly in participation and in the quality of employment, with signs of heightened vulnerability among young women. Occupational segmentation and labour market segregation continue to shape employment patterns, confining women to less stable and less productive positions. Overall, recent dynamics tend to reproduce, rather than reduce, existing gender inequalities.
Labour Market Participation
Labour market participation in the Mediterranean area shows marked disparities by gender and age, confirming a high degree of territorial heterogeneity. In EU countries, Labor force participation rates for the 15–64 age group are generally high, especially for men (75–80%), with relatively contained gender gaps. For example, in Portugal Labor force participation rates stand at 80.0% for men and 75.7% for women, in Spain at 78.5% and 70.6%, and in France at 76.6% and 71.1%. Critical issues emerge among young people aged 15–24, where activity levels are lower and more uneven: in Italy they reach 29.7% for men and 19.4% for women, and in Greece 27.0% and 23.3%, compared with higher values in France (45.0% and 40.2%) and Malta (over 57% for men and 52% for women).
In the Western Balkans, female youth participation remains very limited (below 25% in Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia), while male participation ranges between 32% and 40%. In the 15–64 age group, men reach high activity levels (79.1% in Serbia and 79.7% in Albania), compared with female participation often around 50%.
The Middle East displays the most pronounced asymmetries. Among young people, female participation falls below 10% in Syria (9.3%) and Jordan (9.7%), compared with male rates exceeding 35–40%. Among adults, the gap widens further (Jordan: 64.8% for men and 15.0% for women; Syria: 65.3% and 14.3%). Turkey combines very high male Labor force participation rates (78.1% among those aged 15–64) with substantially lower female participation (41.5%). Israel represents a regional exception, with near-parity levels both among young people (46.9% for men and 46.5% for women) and among adults (75.1% and 72.4%).
Finally, in North Africa female participation is structurally low across all age groups: among young women aged 15–24 it ranges from 7.3% in Algeria to 14.6% in Tunisia, while among those aged 15–64 it stands at 16.3% in Egypt, 15.5% in Algeria and 21.2% in Morocco, whereas male rates remain consistently above 70%. The persistence of these gaps points to deeply rooted forms of female exclusion embedded in socio-economic and institutional contexts.
Overall, the 2024 activity indicator depicts a Mediterranean region characterised by highly differentiated participation regimes. While the European Union shows a greater capacity for labour market integration, albeit with persistent youth-related weaknesses in southern countries, the Western Balkans, the Middle East and North Africa remain marked by wide gender gaps and fragile labour market transitions. These data confirm that the inclusion of young people and women constitutes one of the main structural challenges for the region’s economic and social sustainability, rather than a purely cyclical feature of the economic cycle.
Figure 1 - Activity rates in ages 15-24 and 15-64 by gender. Year 2024 (%)
...
In 2024, the employment rate confirms the strong fragmentation of employment regimes across the Mediterranean, with gender and age emerging as decisive factors of inclusion. In EU countries, employment among the population aged 15 and over is relatively high and more balanced: female employment rates range from 38–39% in Italy and Greece to 58.8% in Cyprus, while male rates consistently exceed 54%, reaching around 70% in Malta (69.6%) and Cyprus (69.1%). Italy remains a critical case, with a female employment rate of 38.4% compared with 55.3% for men.
Among young people aged 15–24, employment is structurally lower. In Italy, only 15.1% of young women are employed (24.0% of young men), and in Greece the figure is 17.1% (20.7% for men). By contrast, Malta and Cyprus record high levels of youth employment also among women (49.3% and 36.9%, respectively), while France and Slovenia display intermediate values, with female employment exceeding 30%.
In the Western Balkans, female employment remains weak, particularly among the adult population: 34.3% in Bosnia and Herzegovina and 36.6% in North Macedonia, compared with male rates above 54%. Even where male employment is relatively high—such as in Serbia (60.9%) and Albania (61.3%)—female employment remains below 48%. Among young people, employed women account for less than 15% in Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia.
The Middle East exhibits the deepest asymmetries. In Turkey, male employment among those aged 15 and over stands at 66.4%, compared with only 32.2% for women; among young people the gap remains wide (50.8% for men and 26.5% for women). In Syria and Jordan, overall female employment is around 10% and falls below 5% among young women, while male employment exceeds 50%. Israel represents a clear exception, with high and near-parity employment levels (60.1% for women and 66.0% for men; among young people, 44.1% and 43.6%).
In North Africa, female employment is structurally very low: between 11% and 21% among the adult population (Egypt, Algeria and Tunisia) and below 10% among young women (4.0–9.1%), against male employment rates exceeding 55–60%. This pattern points to a persistent exclusion of women from the labour market, particularly pronounced among younger generations.
Overall, the employment rate in 2024 reveals a clear geographical and gender gradient: from the European Union, characterised by relatively more inclusive yet still unequal participation, to the Western Balkans, marked by an incomplete transition, and further to the Middle East and North Africa, where female employment—especially among young people—remains largely marginal. The data suggest that the central challenge lies not only in job creation, but in transforming the institutional and social models of access to employment, without which the Mediterranean’s demographic and human potential will continue to be largely underutilised.
Figure 2 - Employment rates in age 15-24 and 15 years and over by gender. Year 2024 (%)
...
In 2024, unemployment rates confirm the presence of strong gender and territorial disparities across the Mediterranean, reflecting differences not only in labour market absorption capacity but also in the degree of inclusiveness of labour markets. Overall, female unemployment is higher than male unemployment, with markedly different intensities across macro-regions.
In European Union countries, unemployment levels are relatively contained and in some cases close to gender parity. In Portugal, unemployment stands at 6.9% for women and 5.9% for men; in Italy at 7.35% and 5.89%; and in France at almost symmetrical levels (7.2% for women and 7.4% for men). More critical conditions emerge in Spain and Greece, where female unemployment exceeds 12% (12.7% and 12.66%, respectively) and is significantly higher than male unemployment. Malta and Slovenia represent the most virtuous cases, with rates below 4% for both genders.
In the Western Balkans, unemployment is on average higher and more volatile. In Serbia, rates remain below 8% (7.44% for women and 6.97% for men), while in Bosnia and Herzegovina female unemployment rises to 11.99% (9.1% for men). In Montenegro and North Macedonia, an atypical pattern emerges, with male unemployment exceeding female unemployment (up to 14.31% in North Macedonia), pointing to unstable labour markets where gender is not the only line of cleavage.
The Middle East displays the most pronounced asymmetries. In Turkey, female unemployment stands at 11.8%, almost double the male rate (6.93%). In Syria and Jordan, the situation is particularly critical: female unemployment reaches 24.94% in Syria and 26.11% in Jordan, compared with 10.44% and 16.17% for men, respectively. Lebanon also shows a persistent gap (14.72% for women and 10.01% for men). Israel represents a notable exception, with very low and near-parity rates (3.58% for women and 3.14% for men).
In North Africa, female unemployment takes on a structural character. In Egypt it reaches 18.28%, compared with 4.88% for men; in Algeria and Tunisia it exceeds 20% (20.48% and 20.84%, respectively), against male rates below 14%. In Libya, female unemployment stands at 24.21% (15.5% for men), while in Morocco, although at more moderate levels, female unemployment (10.64%) remains higher than male unemployment (8.51%). Overall, the picture points to a persistent and deep penalisation of women in labour markets across the southern and eastern Mediterranean.
Taken together, unemployment rates in 2024 confirm the existence of a pronounced Euro-Mediterranean gradient, with the European Union displaying more balanced and resilient labour markets, while the Western Balkans, the Middle East and North Africa remain characterised by high employment vulnerability, especially for women. From a policy perspective, these data suggest that female unemployment is not merely the result of adverse cyclical conditions, but rather reflects institutional, cultural and productive structures that continue to constrain women’s access to employment. Reducing these disparities is therefore essential to strengthening social cohesion and economic sustainability across the Mediterranean region.
Figure 3 - Unemployment rate by gender. Year 2024 (%)
...
Occupational segmentation and occupational segregation
In 2023, the distribution between self-employment and salaried employment clearly highlights the gender and territorial asymmetries of Euro-Mediterranean labour markets.
In European Union countries, employment is predominantly salaried for both genders: among women, the share exceeds 88–90% in France (89.8%), Slovenia (89.8%), Croatia (90.9%), and Cyprus (91.3%), while among men it generally remains above 80%. However, self-employment is more widespread among men, reaching 25.2% in Italy and 35.5% in Greece, compared with 16.1% and 25.0% among women. These figures reflect fragmented productive structures based on micro-enterprises and independent work, which tend to penalise women’s career trajectories more strongly.
In the Western Balkans, the share of self-employment is higher for both genders, signalling less structured labour markets. In Serbia, self-employment involves around 30% of men and 24% of women, while in Bosnia and Herzegovina it exceeds 20% for both. The most extreme case is Albania, where more than half of total employment is self-employed among both men (53.4%) and women (51.1%), highlighting a strong presence of family and informal work.
In the Middle East, male self-employment reaches high levels in fragile contexts such as Syria (38.8%) and Lebanon (35.7%), whereas female self-employment remains more limited (between 10% and 16%). By contrast, in Jordan and Israel more than 90% of female employment is salaried, with male self-employment below 15%, indicating more regulated labour markets.
In North Africa, the incidence of self-employment is structurally high, especially among men (44.2% in Morocco and 33.3% in Algeria), but also among women (27.9% in Egypt and 25.1% in Algeria). In these contexts, female self-employment is often associated with informal work and low levels of social protection.
In conclusion, the high share of self-employment in the Mediterranean signals not so much entrepreneurial dynamism as labour-market segmentation. The data show that, particularly outside the EU, self-employment often represents a response to the scarcity of quality salaried employment, with more penalising effects for women in terms of stability, rights, and social protection.
Figure 4a - Self-employed and wage-earners by gender. Year 2023 (% of female employment)
...
Figure 4b - Self-employed and wage-earners by gender. Year 2023 (% of male employment)
...
In 2023, the share of employers remains very limited and strongly skewed by gender across the entire Euro-Mediterranean area. Among women, the figure rarely exceeds 3–4% of female employment, while among men it more often ranges between 5% and 10%, pointing to a persistent asymmetry in access to structured entrepreneurship.
In European Union countries, female employers account for around 2–4% of women’s employment (3.75% in Italy and 4.2% in Greece), compared with significantly higher male shares (8.0% in Italy and 9.6% in Greece). Even in more regulated contexts such as France and Portugal, male participation is more than double that of women (around 6–7% compared with about 3% for women).
In the Western Balkans, the female share stands at around 2%, while the male share reaches 4–8% (7.9% in North Macedonia), confirming that the widespread incidence of self-employment does not translate into job-creating capacity, particularly for women.
In the Middle East and North Africa, levels are even lower for women: 0.27% in Syria and around 1–2% in Egypt, Algeria and Jordan. Exceptions include countries such as Lebanon, where male employers account for as much as 11.2% of employment, compared with 3.3% for women.
Overall, this indicator shows that entrepreneurship with the capacity to create jobs remains predominantly male. The low incidence of female employers reflects not only individual choices, but also structural barriers in access to capital, networks and opportunities, which constrain women’s contribution to growth and job creation across the Mediterranean region.
Figure 5 - Employers by gender. Year 2023 (% of female and male employment)
...
Gender distribution in sectoral employment
In 2023, the comparison between female and male sectoral employment highlights a structural gender segregation common across the entire Mediterranean area, albeit with differing intensity and configurations across regions.
In European Union countries, women are strongly concentrated in services, which generally account for over 80–90% of female employment (exceeding 90% in Cyprus and Malta), while industry rarely surpasses 15–18% and agriculture plays a marginal role. Men, although also predominantly employed in services (60–70%), display a much higher presence in industry (over 30% in Italy, Portugal and Croatia, and up to 44% in Slovenia) and a slightly larger agricultural share, particularly in Greece (12.7%). This gap reflects a form of horizontal segregation that associates women with services and men with more production-intensive sectors.
In the Western Balkans, the gender gap widens further. Female employment shows strong exposure to agriculture (over 20% in Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, and almost 40% in Albania) and a lower presence in services compared with men. Men, by contrast, are more heavily concentrated in industry (over 35–40% in Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina). The more fragile productive structure of the region thus amplifies a sectoral division that penalises female employment in terms of stability and productivity.
In the Middle East, sectoral disparities are highly dependent on national contexts. In more urbanised and institutionally structured countries (Israel, Jordan and Lebanon), over 90% of women work in services, while men show greater diversification between services and industry. In more fragile or dual contexts, such as Turkey and Syria, both men and women are more present in agriculture and industry, but with a stronger male concentration in productive sectors and a continued female predominance in services.
In North Africa, sectoral segregation reaches its most pronounced form. Women are heavily concentrated in agriculture (up to 47% in Morocco) or in specific segments of manufacturing industry (over 30% in Tunisia), often under conditions of low protection. Men, while also showing a significant agricultural presence (20–25% in Morocco and Egypt), retain a dominant position in industry and a higher degree of sectoral diversification.
In summary, the comparative reading of the data highlights that:
female employment is systematically more concentrated in low-paid service activities or in traditional agriculture, depending on the level of development;
male employment is more diversified and more strongly represented in sectors with higher capital intensity and productivity;
gender-based sectoral segregation intensifies when moving from the EU towards the Western Balkans and North Africa.
These data suggest that reducing gender gaps in the Mediterranean does not depend solely on increasing female participation, but requires a sectoral rebalancing of employment capable of expanding women’s access to industry, advanced services, and the strategic sectors of the digital and ecological transition.
Figure 6a - Distribution of employment in sectors by gender and macro-region. Year 2023 (% of male employment)
...
Figure 6b - Distribution of employment in sectors by gender and macro-region. Year 2023 (% of female employment)
...
This chart is optimized for wider resolutions. The experience on smartphones might not be complete.
Metadata
Indicators
Definition
Percentage of the female population aged 15-24 economically active: all people who offer labour on the market for the production of goods and services in a given period.
Sources
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST); b) Istat for Italy
Methodology
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) - Labour market indicators are estimated using a set of models that establish statistical relationships between the observed labour market indicators and the explanatory variables. To fill in the missing data, linear interpolation is used for the countries for which this procedure is possible; This produces accurate and low-variance estimates, which is not surprising, given that such a indicator is a very persistent variable. In all other cases, a weighted multivariate estimate is made. The countries are divided into nine esteem groups, chosen on the basis of broad economic similarity and geographical proximity. Given the structure of the data and the heterogeneity between the countries covered by the input data, the model was specified using panel data with fixed effects per country. Regressions are weighted by the inverse of the probability of availability of a labour force survey. The explanatory variables used include economic and demographic variables. To produce the estimates for 2020, a cross-validation approach is used to select the model that minimizes the forecast error in that specific year. b) Istat (for Italy) - The data are collected with the Labour Force Survey, a sample survey conducted through interviews with households; The main objective is to estimate the aggregates that make up the labour supply: employed and jobseekers.
Notes
National data on labour force participation rates may not be comparable due to differences in concepts and methodologies. The most important factor affecting the comparability of data is the source of the data itself. Labour force data obtained from population censuses are often based on a limited number of questions about individuals' economic characteristics, with little scope for sampling. The resulting data are therefore generally not consistent with the corresponding labour force survey data and may vary considerably from one country to another, depending on the number and type of questions included in the census. Censuses and surveys of local units can, by their nature, only provide data on the employed population, excluding the unemployed and, in many countries, also excluding workers engaged in small production units or in the informal economy who do not fall within the scope of the survey or census. For international comparisons of labour force data, the most comprehensive source is undoubtedly labour force surveys. However, despite their strength, labour force survey data may contain elements that are not comparable in terms of scope and coverage, mainly due to differences in the inclusion or exclusion of certain geographical areas and the inclusion or exclusion of conscripted military personnel. In addition, there are variations in national definitions of the labour force concept, particularly with regard to the statistical treatment of certain specific groups, such as 'contributing family workers' and 'unemployed persons available for work but not seeking employment'. Non-comparability may also arise from differences in the age limits used to measure the labour force (formerly known as the economically active population). Some countries have adopted non-standard upper age limits for inclusion in the labour force, with a cut-off point at 65 or 70 years, which affects broad comparisons, particularly those at higher age levels. Finally, differences in the dates to which the data refer, as well as the method of calculating the annual average, may contribute to the non-comparability of the resulting statistics. To a large extent, these comparability issues have been addressed in the construction of the ILO's modelled estimates of labour force participation rates included in ILOSTAT. Only data from household labour force surveys and population censuses representative of the entire country (without geographical limitations) were used in the construction of the estimates. In countries with more than one survey source, only one type of source was used. If a labour force survey was available for the country, labour force participation rates derived from this source were chosen in favour of those derived from population censuses. The imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for comparisons or rankings between countries. This series is based on the definitions of the 13th ICLS.
Percentage of the male population aged 15-24 economically active: all people who offer labour on the market for the production of goods and services in a given period.
Sources
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST); b) Istat for Italy
Methodology
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) - Labour market indicators are estimated using a set of models that establish statistical relationships between the observed labour market indicators and the explanatory variables. To fill in the missing data, linear interpolation is used for the countries for which this procedure is possible; This produces accurate and low-variance estimates, which is not surprising, given that such a indicator is a very persistent variable. In all other cases, a weighted multivariate estimate is made. The countries are divided into nine esteem groups, chosen on the basis of broad economic similarity and geographical proximity. Given the structure of the data and the heterogeneity between the countries covered by the input data, the model was specified using panel data with fixed effects per country. Regressions are weighted by the inverse of the probability of availability of a labour force survey. The explanatory variables used include economic and demographic variables. To produce the estimates for 2020, a cross-validation approach is used to select the model that minimizes the forecast error in that specific year. b) Istat (for Italy) - The data are collected with the Labour Force Survey, a sample survey conducted through interviews with households; The main objective is to estimate the aggregates that make up the labour supply: employed and jobseekers.
Notes
National data on labour force participation rates may not be comparable due to differences in concepts and methodologies. The most important factor affecting the comparability of data is the source of the data itself. Labour force data obtained from population censuses are often based on a limited number of questions about individuals' economic characteristics, with little scope for sampling. The resulting data are therefore generally not consistent with the corresponding labour force survey data and may vary considerably from one country to another, depending on the number and type of questions included in the census. Censuses and surveys of local units can, by their nature, only provide data on the employed population, excluding the unemployed and, in many countries, also excluding workers engaged in small production units or in the informal economy who do not fall within the scope of the survey or census. For international comparisons of labour force data, the most comprehensive source is undoubtedly labour force surveys. However, despite their strength, labour force survey data may contain elements that are not comparable in terms of scope and coverage, mainly due to differences in the inclusion or exclusion of certain geographical areas and the inclusion or exclusion of conscripted military personnel. In addition, there are variations in national definitions of the labour force concept, particularly with regard to the statistical treatment of certain specific groups, such as 'contributing family workers' and 'unemployed persons available for work but not seeking employment'. Non-comparability may also arise from differences in the age limits used to measure the labour force (formerly known as the economically active population). Some countries have adopted non-standard upper age limits for inclusion in the labour force, with a cut-off point at 65 or 70 years, which affects broad comparisons, particularly those at higher age levels. Finally, differences in the dates to which the data refer, as well as the method of calculating the annual average, may contribute to the non-comparability of the resulting statistics. To a large extent, these comparability issues have been addressed in the construction of the ILO's modelled estimates of labour force participation rates included in ILOSTAT. Only data from household labour force surveys and population censuses representative of the entire country (without geographical limitations) were used in the construction of the estimates. In countries with more than one survey source, only one type of source was used. If a labour force survey was available for the country, labour force participation rates derived from this source were chosen in favour of those derived from population censuses. The imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for comparisons or rankings between countries. This series is based on the definitions of the 13th ICLS.
Percentage of the female population aged 15-64 economically active: all people who offer labour on the market for the production of goods and services in a given period.
Sources
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST); b) Istat for Italy
Methodology
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) - Labour market indicators are estimated using a set of models that establish statistical relationships between the observed labour market indicators and the explanatory variables. To fill in the missing data, linear interpolation is used for the countries for which this procedure is possible; This produces accurate and low-variance estimates, which is not surprising, given that such a indicator is a very persistent variable. In all other cases, a weighted multivariate estimate is made. The countries are divided into nine esteem groups, chosen on the basis of broad economic similarity and geographical proximity. Given the structure of the data and the heterogeneity between the countries covered by the input data, the model was specified using panel data with fixed effects per country. Regressions are weighted by the inverse of the probability of availability of a labour force survey. The explanatory variables used include economic and demographic variables. To produce the estimates for 2020, a cross-validation approach is used to select the model that minimizes the forecast error in that specific year. b) Istat (for Italy) - The data are collected with the Labour Force Survey, a sample survey conducted through interviews with households; The main objective is to estimate the aggregates that make up the labour supply: employed and jobseekers.
Notes
National data on labour force participation rates may not be comparable due to differences in concepts and methodologies. The most important factor affecting the comparability of data is the source of the data itself. Labour force data obtained from population censuses are often based on a limited number of questions about individuals' economic characteristics, with little scope for sampling. The resulting data are therefore generally not consistent with the corresponding labour force survey data and may vary considerably from one country to another, depending on the number and type of questions included in the census. Censuses and surveys of local units can, by their nature, only provide data on the employed population, excluding the unemployed and, in many countries, also excluding workers engaged in small production units or in the informal economy who do not fall within the scope of the survey or census. For international comparisons of labour force data, the most comprehensive source is undoubtedly labour force surveys. However, despite their strength, labour force survey data may contain elements that are not comparable in terms of scope and coverage, mainly due to differences in the inclusion or exclusion of certain geographical areas and the inclusion or exclusion of conscripted military personnel. In addition, there are variations in national definitions of the labour force concept, particularly with regard to the statistical treatment of certain specific groups, such as 'contributing family workers' and 'unemployed persons available for work but not seeking employment'. Non-comparability may also arise from differences in the age limits used to measure the labour force (formerly known as the economically active population). Some countries have adopted non-standard upper age limits for inclusion in the labour force, with a cut-off point at 65 or 70 years, which affects broad comparisons, particularly those of higher age levels. Finally, differences in the dates to which the data refer, as well as the method of calculating the annual average, may contribute to the non-comparability of the resulting statistics. To a large extent, these comparability issues have been addressed in the construction of the ILO's modelled estimates of labour force participation rates included in ILOSTAT. Only data from household labour force surveys and population censuses representative of the entire country (without geographical limitations) were used in the construction of the estimates. In countries with more than one survey source, only one type of source was used. If a labour force survey was available for the country, labour force participation rates derived from this source were chosen in favour of those derived from population censuses. The imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for comparisons or rankings between countries. This series is based on the definitions of the 13th ICLS.
Presence in policy-oriented statistical systems
ENP-South Eurostat Data Browser: Population and Social Conditions Area
Percentage of the male population aged 15-64 economically active: all people who offer labour on the market for the production of goods and services in a given period.
Sources
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST); b) Istat for Italy
Methodology
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) - Labour market indicators are estimated using a set of models that establish statistical relationships between the observed labour market indicators and the explanatory variables. To fill in the missing data, linear interpolation is used for the countries for which this procedure is possible; This produces accurate and low-variance estimates, which is not surprising, given that such a indicator is a very persistent variable. In all other cases, a weighted multivariate estimate is made. The countries are divided into nine esteem groups, chosen on the basis of broad economic similarity and geographical proximity. Given the structure of the data and the heterogeneity between the countries covered by the input data, the model was specified using panel data with fixed effects per country. Regressions are weighted by the inverse of the probability of availability of a labour force survey. The explanatory variables used include economic and demographic variables. To produce the estimates for 2020, a cross-validation approach is used to select the model that minimizes the forecast error in that specific year. b) Istat (for Italy) - The data are collected with the Labour Force Survey, a sample survey conducted through interviews with households; The main objective is to estimate the aggregates that make up the labour supply: employed and jobseekers.
Notes
National data on labour force participation rates may not be comparable due to differences in concepts and methodologies. The most important factor affecting the comparability of data is the source of the data itself. Labour force data obtained from population censuses are often based on a limited number of questions about individuals' economic characteristics, with little scope for sampling. The resulting data are therefore generally not consistent with the corresponding labour force survey data and may vary considerably from one country to another, depending on the number and type of questions included in the census. Censuses and surveys of local units can, by their nature, only provide data on the employed population, excluding the unemployed and, in many countries, also excluding workers engaged in small production units or in the informal economy who do not fall within the scope of the survey or census. For international comparisons of labour force data, the most comprehensive source is undoubtedly labour force surveys. However, despite their strength, labour force survey data may contain elements that are not comparable in terms of scope and coverage, mainly due to differences in the inclusion or exclusion of certain geographical areas and the inclusion or exclusion of conscripted military personnel. In addition, there are variations in national definitions of the labour force concept, particularly with regard to the statistical treatment of certain specific groups, such as 'contributing family workers' and 'unemployed persons available for work but not seeking employment'. Non-comparability may also arise from differences in the age limits used to measure the labour force (formerly known as the economically active population). Some countries have adopted non-standard upper age limits for inclusion in the labour force, with a cut-off point at 65 or 70 years, which affects broad comparisons, particularly those of higher age levels. Finally, differences in the dates to which the data refer, as well as the method of calculating the annual average, may contribute to the non-comparability of the resulting statistics. To a large extent, these comparability issues have been addressed in the construction of the ILO's modelled estimates of labour force participation rates included in ILOSTAT. Only data from household labour force surveys and population censuses representative of the entire country (without geographical limitations) were used in the construction of the estimates. In countries with more than one survey source, only one type of source was used. If a labour force survey was available for the country, labour force participation rates derived from this source were chosen in favour of those derived from population censuses. The imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for comparisons or rankings between countries. This series is based on the definitions of the 13th ICLS.
Presence in policy-oriented statistical systems
ENP-South Eurostat Data Browser: Population and Social Conditions Area
Women of working age engaged in the agricultural sector in any activity of production of goods or provision of services for consideration or profit, whether they are working in the reference period or not working due to a temporary absence from work or an agreement on working time. The agricultural sector consists of agriculture, hunting, forestry and fishing, according to division 1 (ISIC 2) or categories A-B (ISIC 3) or category A (ISIC 4).
Sources
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST); b) Istat for Italy
Methodology
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) - Labour market indicators are estimated using a set of models that establish statistical relationships between the observed labour market indicators and the explanatory variables. To fill in the missing data, linear interpolation is used for the countries for which this procedure is possible; This produces accurate and low-variance estimates, which is not surprising, given that such a indicator is a very persistent variable. In all other cases, a weighted multivariate estimate is made. The countries are divided into nine esteem groups, chosen on the basis of broad economic similarity and geographical proximity. Given the structure of the data and the heterogeneity between the countries covered by the input data, the model was specified using panel data with fixed effects per country. Regressions are weighted by the inverse of the probability of availability of a labour force survey. The explanatory variables used include economic and demographic variables. To produce the estimates for 2020, a cross-validation approach is used to select the model that minimizes the forecast error in that specific year. b) Istat (for Italy) - The data are collected with the Labour Force Survey, a sample survey conducted through interviews with households; The main objective is to estimate the aggregates that make up the labour supply: employed and jobseekers.
Notes
The data presented by economic activity branch are based on the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC). Its main purpose is to provide a set of activity categories that can be used for the collection and reporting of statistics. The original version of ISIC was adopted in 1948 and has since been revised four times: in 1968 (ISIC Rev.2), in 1990 (ISIC Rev.3) and in 2008 (ISIC Rev.4). An updated version of ISIC Rev. 3 was introduced in 2002 to take account of substantial changes in the economic structure of many countries (ISIC Rev. 3.1). It is important to note that countries may use different versions of ISIC, and that countries move to the adoption of the latest version at different times. A country may continue to use the previous version even after starting a new data series according to the latest version. Although these different classification systems may have an impact on comparability at detailed levels of economic activity, changes from one ISIC to another should not have a significant impact on the information for the three broad sectors presented in ILOSTAT. A number of factors may limit the comparability of employment statistics by economic activity between countries or over time. The comparability of employment statistics between countries is significantly affected by variations in the definitions used for employment data. Differences may arise from age coverage, such as lower and upper age limits for labour force activity. Employment estimates may also vary depending on whether members of the armed forces are included. When the armed forces are included in the measurement of employment, they are usually assigned to the service sector. Therefore, in countries that do not include the armed forces, the service sector tends to be underestimated compared to countries where they are included. Another area of measurement difference concerns the national treatment of particular groups of workers. The international definition of employment includes all persons who worked for at least one hour during the reference period. Workers may be paid or self-employed, even in less obvious forms of work, some of which are discussed in detail in the resolution adopted by the 19th ICLS, such as unpaid family work, apprenticeships or non-market production. Most exceptions to the coverage of all employed persons in a labour force survey have to do with minor national variations from the international recommendation applicable to alternative employment statuses. For example, some countries measure only paid employees, while others measure 'all employed persons', i.e. paid workers and business owners who receive remuneration based on company shares. Other possible variations to the rules for measuring total employment include hour limits (over one hour) imposed on family members who contribute before being included in employment. Comparisons can also be problematic when the frequency of data collection varies. The interval for collecting information can range from one month to 12 months in a year. Since seasonality of various kinds is undoubtedly present in all countries, employment data may vary for this reason alone. In addition, changes in the level of employment may occur during the year, but this may be obscured when fewer observations are available.
Men of working age engaged in the agricultural sector in any activity of production of goods or provision of services for consideration or profit, whether they are working during the reference period or not working because of a temporary absence from work or an agreement on working time. The agricultural sector consists of agriculture, hunting, forestry and fishing, according to division 1 (ISIC 2) or categories A-B (ISIC 3) or category A (ISIC 4).
Sources
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST); b) Istat for Italy
Methodology
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) - Labour market indicators are estimated using a set of models that establish statistical relationships between the observed labour market indicators and the explanatory variables. To fill in the missing data, linear interpolation is used for the countries for which this procedure is possible; This produces accurate and low-variance estimates, which is not surprising, given that such a indicator is a very persistent variable. In all other cases, a weighted multivariate estimate is made. The countries are divided into nine esteem groups, chosen on the basis of broad economic similarity and geographical proximity. Given the structure of the data and the heterogeneity between the countries covered by the input data, the model was specified using panel data with fixed effects per country. Regressions are weighted by the inverse of the probability of availability of a labour force survey. The explanatory variables used include economic and demographic variables. To produce the estimates for 2020, a cross-validation approach is used to select the model that minimizes the forecast error in that specific year. b) Istat (for Italy) - The data are collected with the Labour Force Survey, a sample survey conducted through interviews with households; The main objective is to estimate the aggregates that make up the labour supply: employed and jobseekers.
Notes
The data presented by economic activity branch are based on the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC). Its main purpose is to provide a set of activity categories that can be used for the collection and reporting of statistics. The original version of ISIC was adopted in 1948 and has since been revised four times: in 1968 (ISIC Rev.2), in 1990 (ISIC Rev.3) and in 2008 (ISIC Rev.4). An updated version of ISIC Rev. 3 was introduced in 2002 to take account of substantial changes in the economic structure of many countries (ISIC Rev. 3.1). It is important to note that countries may use different versions of ISIC, and that countries move to the adoption of the latest version at different times. A country may continue to use the previous version even after starting a new data series according to the latest version. Although these different classification systems may have an impact on comparability at detailed levels of economic activity, changes from one ISIC to another should not have a significant impact on the information for the three broad sectors presented in ILOSTAT. A number of factors may limit the comparability of employment statistics by economic activity between countries or over time. The comparability of employment statistics between countries is significantly affected by variations in the definitions used for employment data. Differences may arise from age coverage, such as lower and upper age limits for labour force activity. Employment estimates may also vary depending on whether members of the armed forces are included. When the armed forces are included in the measurement of employment, they are usually assigned to the service sector. Therefore, in countries that do not include the armed forces, the service sector tends to be underestimated compared to countries where they are included. Another area of measurement difference concerns the national treatment of particular groups of workers. The international definition of employment includes all persons who worked for at least one hour during the reference period. Workers may be paid or self-employed, even in less obvious forms of work, some of which are discussed in detail in the resolution adopted by the 19th ICLS, such as unpaid family work, apprenticeships or non-market production. Most exceptions to the coverage of all employed persons in a labour force survey have to do with minor national variations from the international recommendation applicable to alternative employment statuses. For example, some countries measure only paid employees, while others measure 'all employed persons', i.e. paid workers and business owners who receive remuneration based on company shares. Other possible variations to the rules for measuring total employment include hour limits (over one hour) imposed on family members who contribute before being included in employment. Comparisons can also be problematic when the frequency of data collection varies. The interval for collecting information can range from one month to 12 months in a year. Since seasonality of various kinds is undoubtedly present in all countries, employment data may vary for this reason alone. In addition, changes in the level of employment may occur during the year, but this may be obscured when fewer observations are available.
Women of working age engaged in the industrial sector in any activity of production of goods or provision of services for consideration or profit, whether they are working during the reference period or not working because of a temporary absence from work or an agreement on working time. The industrial sector includes mineral extraction, manufacturing, construction and utilities (electricity, gas and water), according to divisions 2-5 (ISIC 2) or categories C-F (ISIC 3) or categories B-F (ISIC 4).
Sources
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST); b) Istat for Italy
Methodology
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) - Labour market indicators are estimated using a set of models that establish statistical relationships between the observed labour market indicators and the explanatory variables. To fill in the missing data, linear interpolation is used for the countries for which this procedure is possible; This produces accurate and low-variance estimates, which is not surprising, given that such a indicator is a very persistent variable. In all other cases, a weighted multivariate estimate is made. The countries are divided into nine esteem groups, chosen on the basis of broad economic similarity and geographical proximity. Given the structure of the data and the heterogeneity between the countries covered by the input data, the model was specified using panel data with fixed effects per country. Regressions are weighted by the inverse of the probability of availability of a labour force survey. The explanatory variables used include economic and demographic variables. To produce the estimates for 2020, a cross-validation approach is used to select the model that minimizes the forecast error in that specific year. b) Istat (for Italy) - The data are collected with the Labour Force Survey, a sample survey conducted through interviews with households; The main objective is to estimate the aggregates that make up the labour supply: employed and jobseekers.
Notes
The data presented by economic activity branch are based on the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC). Its main purpose is to provide a set of activity categories that can be used for the collection and reporting of statistics. The original version of ISIC was adopted in 1948 and has since been revised four times: in 1968 (ISIC Rev.2), in 1990 (ISIC Rev.3) and in 2008 (ISIC Rev.4). An updated version of ISIC Rev. 3 was introduced in 2002 to take account of substantial changes in the economic structure of many countries (ISIC Rev. 3.1). It is important to note that countries may use different versions of ISIC, and that countries move to the adoption of the latest version at different times. A country may continue to use the previous version even after starting a new data series according to the latest version. Although these different classification systems may have an impact on comparability at detailed levels of economic activity, changes from one ISIC to another should not have a significant impact on the information for the three broad sectors presented in ILOSTAT. A number of factors may limit the comparability of employment statistics by economic activity between countries or over time. The comparability of employment statistics between countries is significantly affected by variations in the definitions used for employment data. Differences may arise from age coverage, such as lower and upper age limits for labour force activity. Employment estimates may also vary depending on whether members of the armed forces are included. When the armed forces are included in the measurement of employment, they are usually assigned to the service sector. Therefore, in countries that do not include the armed forces, the service sector tends to be underestimated compared to countries where they are included. Another area of measurement difference concerns the national treatment of particular groups of workers. The international definition of employment includes all persons who worked for at least one hour during the reference period. Workers may be paid or self-employed, even in less obvious forms of work, some of which are discussed in detail in the resolution adopted by the 19th ICLS, such as unpaid family work, apprenticeships or non-market production. Most exceptions to the coverage of all employed persons in a labour force survey have to do with minor national variations from the international recommendation applicable to alternative employment statuses. For example, some countries measure only paid employees, while others measure 'all employed persons', i.e. paid workers and business owners who receive remuneration based on company shares. Other possible variations to the rules for measuring total employment include hour limits (over one hour) imposed on family members who contribute before being included in employment. Comparisons can also be problematic when the frequency of data collection varies. The interval for collecting information can range from one month to 12 months in a year. Since seasonality of various kinds is undoubtedly present in all countries, employment data may vary for this reason alone. In addition, changes in the level of employment may occur during the year, but this may be obscured when fewer observations are available.
Men of working age engaged in the industrial sector in any activity of production of goods or provision of services for consideration or profit, whether they are working during the reference period or not working because of a temporary absence from work or an agreement on working time. The industrial sector includes mineral extraction, manufacturing, construction and utilities (electricity, gas and water), according to divisions 2-5 (ISIC 2) or categories C-F (ISIC 3) or categories B-F (ISIC 4).
Sources
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST); b) Istat for Italy
Methodology
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) - Labour market indicators are estimated using a set of models that establish statistical relationships between the observed labour market indicators and the explanatory variables. To fill in the missing data, linear interpolation is used for the countries for which this procedure is possible; This produces accurate and low-variance estimates, which is not surprising, given that such a indicator is a very persistent variable. In all other cases, a weighted multivariate estimate is made. The countries are divided into nine esteem groups, chosen on the basis of broad economic similarity and geographical proximity. Given the structure of the data and the heterogeneity between the countries covered by the input data, the model was specified using panel data with fixed effects per country. Regressions are weighted by the inverse of the probability of availability of a labour force survey. The explanatory variables used include economic and demographic variables. To produce the estimates for 2020, a cross-validation approach is used to select the model that minimizes the forecast error in that specific year. b) Istat (for Italy) - The data are collected with the Labour Force Survey, a sample survey conducted through interviews with households; The main objective is to estimate the aggregates that make up the labour supply: employed and jobseekers.
Notes
The data presented by economic activity branch are based on the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC). Its main purpose is to provide a set of activity categories that can be used for the collection and reporting of statistics. The original version of ISIC was adopted in 1948 and has since been revised four times: in 1968 (ISIC Rev.2), in 1990 (ISIC Rev.3) and in 2008 (ISIC Rev.4). An updated version of ISIC Rev. 3 was introduced in 2002 to take account of substantial changes in the economic structure of many countries (ISIC Rev. 3.1). It is important to note that countries may use different versions of ISIC, and that countries move to the adoption of the latest version at different times. A country may continue to use the previous version even after starting a new data series according to the latest version. Although these different classification systems may have an impact on comparability at detailed levels of economic activity, changes from one ISIC to another should not have a significant impact on the information for the three broad sectors presented in ILOSTAT. A number of factors may limit the comparability of employment statistics by economic activity between countries or over time. The comparability of employment statistics between countries is significantly affected by variations in the definitions used for employment data. Differences may arise from age coverage, such as lower and upper age limits for labour force activity. Employment estimates may also vary depending on whether members of the armed forces are included. When the armed forces are included in the measurement of employment, they are usually assigned to the service sector. Therefore, in countries that do not include the armed forces, the service sector tends to be underestimated compared to countries where they are included. Another area of measurement difference concerns the national treatment of particular groups of workers. The international definition of employment includes all persons who worked for at least one hour during the reference period. Workers may be paid or self-employed, even in less obvious forms of work, some of which are discussed in detail in the resolution adopted by the 19th ICLS, such as unpaid family work, apprenticeships or non-market production. Most exceptions to the coverage of all employed persons in a labour force survey have to do with minor national variations from the international recommendation applicable to alternative employment statuses. For example, some countries measure only paid employees, while others measure 'all employed persons', i.e. paid workers and business owners who receive remuneration based on company shares. Other possible variations to the rules for measuring total employment include hour limits (over one hour) imposed on family members who contribute before being included in employment. Comparisons can also be problematic when the frequency of data collection varies. The interval for collecting information can range from one month to 12 months in a year. Since seasonality of various kinds is undoubtedly present in all countries, employment data may vary for this reason alone. In addition, changes in the level of employment may occur during the year, but this may be obscured when fewer observations are available.
Women of working age engaged in the Services sector in any activity of producing goods or providing services for remuneration or profit, whether they were at work during the reference period, or not at work due to a temporary absence from a workplace or an agreement on working time. The services sector includes wholesale and retail trade, restaurants and hotels, transport, warehousing and communications, financing, insurance, real estate and business services, as well as social and personal services, according to divisions 6-9 (ISIC 2) or categories G-Q (ISIC 3) or categories G-U (ISIC 4).
Sources
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST); b) Istat for Italy
Methodology
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) - Labour market indicators are estimated using a set of models that establish statistical relationships between the observed labour market indicators and the explanatory variables. To fill in the missing data, linear interpolation is used for the countries for which this procedure is possible; This produces accurate and low-variance estimates, which is not surprising, given that such a indicator is a very persistent variable. In all other cases, a weighted multivariate estimate is made. The countries are divided into nine esteem groups, chosen on the basis of broad economic similarity and geographical proximity. Given the structure of the data and the heterogeneity between the countries covered by the input data, the model was specified using panel data with fixed effects per country. Regressions are weighted by the inverse of the probability of availability of a labour force survey. The explanatory variables used include economic and demographic variables. To produce the estimates for 2020, a cross-validation approach is used to select the model that minimizes the forecast error in that specific year. b) Istat (for Italy) - The data are collected with the Labour Force Survey, a sample survey conducted through interviews with households; The main objective is to estimate the aggregates that make up the labour supply: employed and jobseekers.
Notes
The data presented by economic activity branch are based on the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC). Its main purpose is to provide a set of activity categories that can be used for the collection and reporting of statistics. The original version of ISIC was adopted in 1948 and has since been revised four times: in 1968 (ISIC Rev.2), in 1990 (ISIC Rev.3) and in 2008 (ISIC Rev.4). An updated version of ISIC Rev. 3 was introduced in 2002 to take account of substantial changes in the economic structure of many countries (ISIC Rev. 3.1). It is important to note that countries may use different versions of ISIC, and that countries move to the adoption of the latest version at different times. A country may continue to use the previous version even after starting a new data series according to the latest version. Although these different classification systems may have an impact on comparability at detailed levels of economic activity, changes from one ISIC to another should not have a significant impact on the information for the three broad sectors presented in ILOSTAT. A number of factors may limit the comparability of employment statistics by economic activity between countries or over time. The comparability of employment statistics between countries is significantly affected by variations in the definitions used for employment data. Differences may arise from age coverage, such as lower and upper age limits for labour force activity. Employment estimates may also vary depending on whether members of the armed forces are included. When the armed forces are included in the measurement of employment, they are usually assigned to the service sector. Therefore, in countries that do not include the armed forces, the service sector tends to be underestimated compared to countries where they are included. Another area of measurement difference concerns the national treatment of particular groups of workers. The international definition of employment includes all persons who worked for at least one hour during the reference period. Workers may be paid or self-employed, even in less obvious forms of work, some of which are discussed in detail in the resolution adopted by the 19th ICLS, such as unpaid family work, apprenticeships or non-market production. Most exceptions to the coverage of all employed persons in a labour force survey have to do with minor national variations from the international recommendation applicable to alternative employment statuses. For example, some countries measure only paid employees, while others measure 'all employed persons', i.e. paid workers and business owners who receive remuneration based on company shares. Other possible variations to the rules for measuring total employment include hour limits (over one hour) imposed on family members who contribute before being included in employment. Comparisons can also be problematic when the frequency of data collection varies. The interval for collecting information can range from one month to 12 months in a year. Since seasonality of various kinds is undoubtedly present in all countries, employment data may vary for this reason alone. In addition, changes in the level of employment may occur during the year, but this may be obscured when fewer observations are available.
Men of working age engaged in the Services sector in any activity of producing goods or providing services for remuneration or profit, whether they were at work during the reference period, or not at work due to a temporary absence from a workplace or an agreement on working time. The services sector includes wholesale and retail trade, restaurants and hotels, transport, warehousing and communications, financing, insurance, real estate and business services, as well as social and personal services, according to divisions 6-9 (ISIC 2) or categories G-Q (ISIC 3) or categories G-U (ISIC 4).
Sources
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST); b) Istat for Italy
Methodology
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) - Labour market indicators are estimated using a set of models that establish statistical relationships between the observed labour market indicators and the explanatory variables. To fill in the missing data, linear interpolation is used for the countries for which this procedure is possible; This produces accurate and low-variance estimates, which is not surprising, given that such a indicator is a very persistent variable. In all other cases, a weighted multivariate estimate is made. The countries are divided into nine esteem groups, chosen on the basis of broad economic similarity and geographical proximity. Given the structure of the data and the heterogeneity between the countries covered by the input data, the model was specified using panel data with fixed effects per country. Regressions are weighted by the inverse of the probability of availability of a labour force survey. The explanatory variables used include economic and demographic variables. To produce the estimates for 2020, a cross-validation approach is used to select the model that minimizes the forecast error in that specific year. b) Istat (for Italy) - The data are collected with the Labour Force Survey, a sample survey conducted through interviews with households; The main objective is to estimate the aggregates that make up the labour supply: employed and jobseekers.
Notes
The data presented by economic activity branch are based on the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC). Its main purpose is to provide a set of activity categories that can be used for the collection and reporting of statistics. The original version of ISIC was adopted in 1948 and has since been revised four times: in 1968 (ISIC Rev.2), in 1990 (ISIC Rev.3) and in 2008 (ISIC Rev.4). An updated version of ISIC Rev. 3 was introduced in 2002 to take account of substantial changes in the economic structure of many countries (ISIC Rev. 3.1). It is important to note that countries may use different versions of ISIC, and that countries move to the adoption of the latest version at different times. A country may continue to use the previous version even after starting a new data series according to the latest version. Although these different classification systems may have an impact on comparability at detailed levels of economic activity, changes from one ISIC to another should not have a significant impact on the information for the three broad sectors presented in ILOSTAT. A number of factors may limit the comparability of employment statistics by economic activity between countries or over time. The comparability of employment statistics between countries is significantly affected by variations in the definitions used for employment data. Differences may arise from age coverage, such as lower and upper age limits for labour force activity. Employment estimates may also vary depending on whether members of the armed forces are included. When the armed forces are included in the measurement of employment, they are usually assigned to the service sector. Therefore, in countries that do not include the armed forces, the service sector tends to be underestimated compared to countries where they are included. Another area of measurement difference concerns the national treatment of particular groups of workers. The international definition of employment includes all persons who worked for at least one hour during the reference period. Workers may be paid or self-employed, even in less obvious forms of work, some of which are discussed in detail in the resolution adopted by the 19th ICLS, such as unpaid family work, apprenticeships or non-market production. Most exceptions to the coverage of all employed persons in a labour force survey have to do with minor national variations from the international recommendation applicable to alternative employment statuses. For example, some countries measure only paid employees, while others measure 'all employed persons', i.e. paid workers and business owners who receive remuneration based on company shares. Other possible variations to the rules for measuring total employment include hour limits (over one hour) imposed on family members who contribute before being included in employment. Comparisons can also be problematic when the frequency of data collection varies. The interval for collecting information can range from one month to 12 months in a year. Since seasonality of various kinds is undoubtedly present in all countries, employment data may vary for this reason alone. In addition, changes in the level of employment may occur during the year, but this may be obscured when fewer observations are available.
Percentage of employed female population of a country in the age group 15-24 years. Employment is defined as persons of working age who, during a short reporting period, have been engaged in any activity of producing goods or providing services for remuneration or profit, whether they were at work during the reporting period (i.e. worked at a workplace for at least one hour) or were not at work due to temporary absence from a post or agreements on working time. The age between 15 and 24 is generally considered the reference for the young population.
Sources
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST); b) Istat for Italy
Methodology
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) - Labour market indicators are estimated using a set of models that establish statistical relationships between the observed labour market indicators and the explanatory variables. To fill in the missing data, linear interpolation is used for countries for which this procedure is possible. This procedure produces accurate, low-variance estimates, which is not surprising, given that LFPR is a very persistent variable. In all other cases, a weighted multivariate estimate is made. The countries are divided into nine esteem groups, chosen on the basis of broad economic similarity and geographical proximity. Given the structure of the data and the heterogeneity between the countries covered by the input data, the model was specified using panel data with fixed effects per country. Regressions are weighted by the inverse of the probability of availability of a labour force survey. The explanatory variables used include economic and demographic variables. To produce the estimates for 2020, a cross-validation approach is used to select the model that minimizes the forecast error in that specific year. b) Istat (for Italy) - The data are collected with the Labour Force Survey, a sample survey conducted through interviews with households; The main objective is to estimate the aggregates that make up the labour supply: employed and jobseekers.
Percentage of employed male population of a country in the age group 15-24 years. Employment is defined as persons of working age who, during a short reporting period, have been engaged in any activity of producing goods or providing services for remuneration or profit, whether they were at work during the reporting period (i.e. worked at a workplace for at least one hour) or were not at work due to temporary absence from a post or agreements on working time. The age between 15 and 24 is generally considered the reference for the young population.
Sources
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST); b) Istat for Italy
Methodology
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) - Labour market indicators are estimated using a set of models that establish statistical relationships between the observed labour market indicators and the explanatory variables. To fill in the missing data, linear interpolation is used for countries for which this procedure is possible. This procedure produces accurate, low-variance estimates, which is not surprising, given that LFPR is a very persistent variable. In all other cases, a weighted multivariate estimate is made. The countries are divided into nine esteem groups, chosen on the basis of broad economic similarity and geographical proximity. Given the structure of the data and the heterogeneity between the countries covered by the input data, the model was specified using panel data with fixed effects per country. Regressions are weighted by the inverse of the probability of availability of a labour force survey. The explanatory variables used include economic and demographic variables. To produce the estimates for 2020, a cross-validation approach is used to select the model that minimizes the forecast error in that specific year. b) Istat (for Italy) - The data are collected with the Labour Force Survey, a sample survey conducted through interviews with households; The main objective is to estimate the aggregates that make up the labour supply: employed and jobseekers.
Women who, working on their own account or with one or more partners, carry out jobs in which the salary depends directly on the profits deriving from the goods and services produced, and who, in this capacity, have hired, on a continuous basis, one or more people who work for them as employees.
Sources
ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST)
Methodology
Labour market indicators are estimated using a set of models that establish statistical relationships between the observed labour market indicators and the explanatory variables. Linear interpolation is used to fill in missing data for countries for which this procedure is possible. The countries are divided into nine esteem groups, chosen on the basis of broad economic similarity and geographical proximity. Based on the data structure and the heterogeneity between the countries covered by the input data, the model was specified using panel data with fixed effects per country. Regressions are weighted by the inverse of the probability of availability of a labour force survey. The explanatory variables used include economic and demographic variables. To produce the estimates for 2020, a cross-validation approach is used to select the model that minimizes the forecast error in that specific year.
Notes
For international comparisons of labour force data, the most comprehensive source is undoubtedly the LFS. However, despite their strength, LFS data may contain elements that are not comparable in terms of scope and coverage, mainly due to differences in the inclusion or exclusion of certain geographical areas and whether or not conscripts are included. In addition, there are variations in national definitions of the concept of labour force, in particular with regard to the statistical treatment of certain specific groups, such as 'family contributors' and 'persons not in employment, available for work but not seeking employment'. Non-comparability may also result from differences in the age limits used to measure the labour force (formerly known as the economically active population). Some countries have adopted non-standard upper age limits for inclusion in the workforce, with a cut-off point at 65 or 70, which affects broad comparisons, and in particular those of higher age levels. Finally, differences in the dates to which the data refer, as well as the method of calculating the annual average, may contribute to the non-comparability of the resulting statistics. To a large extent, these comparability issues have been addressed in the construction of ILO-modeled estimates of labour force participation rates included in ILOSTAT. Only data from household labour force surveys and population censuses representative of the whole country (without geographical limitations) were used to construct the estimates. In countries with more than one survey source, only one type of source was used. If a labour force survey was available for the country, labour force participation rates from this source were chosen in favour of those from population censuses. The imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for comparisons or rankings between countries. This series is based on the definitions of the thirteenth ICLS.
Men who, working on their own account or with one or more partners, carry out jobs in which the salary depends directly on the profits deriving from the goods and services produced, and who, in this capacity, have hired, on a continuous basis, one or more people who work for them as employees.
Sources
ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST)
Methodology
Labour market indicators are estimated using a set of models that establish statistical relationships between the observed labour market indicators and the explanatory variables. Linear interpolation is used to fill in missing data for countries for which this procedure is possible. The countries are divided into nine esteem groups, chosen on the basis of broad economic similarity and geographical proximity. Based on the data structure and the heterogeneity between the countries covered by the input data, the model was specified using panel data with fixed effects per country. Regressions are weighted by the inverse of the probability of availability of a labour force survey. The explanatory variables used include economic and demographic variables. To produce the estimates for 2020, a cross-validation approach is used to select the model that minimizes the forecast error in that specific year.
Notes
For international comparisons of labour force data, the most comprehensive source is undoubtedly the LFS. However, despite their strength, LFS data may contain elements that are not comparable in terms of scope and coverage, mainly due to differences in the inclusion or exclusion of certain geographical areas and whether or not conscripts are included. In addition, there are variations in national definitions of the concept of labour force, in particular with regard to the statistical treatment of certain specific groups, such as 'family contributors' and 'persons not in employment, available for work but not seeking employment'. Non-comparability may also result from differences in the age limits used to measure the labour force (formerly known as the economically active population). Some countries have adopted non-standard upper age limits for inclusion in the workforce, with a cut-off point at 65 or 70, which affects broad comparisons, and in particular those of higher age levels. Finally, differences in the dates to which the data refer, as well as the method of calculating the annual average, may contribute to the non-comparability of the resulting statistics. To a large extent, these comparability issues have been addressed in the construction of ILO-modeled estimates of labour force participation rates included in ILOSTAT. Only data from household labour force surveys and population censuses representative of the whole country (without geographical limitations) were used to construct the estimates. In countries with more than one survey source, only one type of source was used. If a labour force survey was available for the country, labour force participation rates from this source were chosen in favour of those from population censuses. The imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for comparisons or rankings between countries. This series is based on the definitions of the thirteenth ICLS.
Women who, working on their own account or with one or more members or in cooperatives, carry out jobs in which the salary depends directly on the profits deriving from the goods and services produced. The self-employed comprise four subcategories: employers, self-employed workers, members of producer cooperatives and family workers.
Sources
ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST)
Methodology
Labour market indicators are estimated using a set of models that establish statistical relationships between the observed labour market indicators and the explanatory variables. Linear interpolation is used to fill in missing data for countries for which this procedure is possible. The countries are divided into nine esteem groups, chosen on the basis of broad economic similarity and geographical proximity. Based on the data structure and the heterogeneity between the countries covered by the input data, the model was specified using panel data with fixed effects per country. Regressions are weighted by the inverse of the probability of availability of a labour force survey. The explanatory variables used include economic and demographic variables. To produce the estimates for 2020, a cross-validation approach is used to select the model that minimizes the forecast error in that specific year.
Notes
For international comparisons of labour force data, the most comprehensive source is undoubtedly the LFS. However, despite their strength, LFS data may contain elements that are not comparable in terms of scope and coverage, mainly due to differences in the inclusion or exclusion of certain geographical areas and whether or not conscripts are included. In addition, there are variations in national definitions of the concept of labour force, in particular with regard to the statistical treatment of certain specific groups, such as 'family contributors' and 'persons not in employment, available for work but not seeking employment'. Non-comparability may also result from differences in the age limits used to measure the labour force (formerly known as the economically active population). Some countries have adopted non-standard upper age limits for inclusion in the workforce, with a cut-off point at 65 or 70, which affects broad comparisons, and in particular those of higher age levels. Finally, differences in the dates to which the data refer, as well as the method of calculating the annual average, may contribute to the non-comparability of the resulting statistics. To a large extent, these comparability issues have been addressed in the construction of ILO-modeled estimates of labour force participation rates included in ILOSTAT. Only data from household labour force surveys and population censuses representative of the whole country (without geographical limitations) were used to construct the estimates. In countries with more than one survey source, only one type of source was used. If a labour force survey was available for the country, labour force participation rates from this source were chosen in favour of those from population censuses. The imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for comparisons or rankings between countries. This series is based on the definitions of the thirteenth ICLS.
Men who, working on their own account or with one or more members or in cooperatives, carry out jobs in which the salary depends directly on the profits deriving from the goods and services produced. The self-employed comprise four subcategories: employers, self-employed workers, members of producer cooperatives and family workers.
Sources
ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST)
Methodology
Labour market indicators are estimated using a set of models that establish statistical relationships between the observed labour market indicators and the explanatory variables. Linear interpolation is used to fill in missing data for countries for which this procedure is possible. The countries are divided into nine esteem groups, chosen on the basis of broad economic similarity and geographical proximity. Based on the data structure and the heterogeneity between the countries covered by the input data, the model was specified using panel data with fixed effects per country. Regressions are weighted by the inverse of the probability of availability of a labour force survey. The explanatory variables used include economic and demographic variables. To produce the estimates for 2020, a cross-validation approach is used to select the model that minimizes the forecast error in that specific year.
Notes
For international comparisons of labour force data, the most comprehensive source is undoubtedly the LFS. However, despite their strength, LFS data may contain elements that are not comparable in terms of scope and coverage, mainly due to differences in the inclusion or exclusion of certain geographical areas and whether or not conscripts are included. In addition, there are variations in national definitions of the concept of labour force, in particular with regard to the statistical treatment of certain specific groups, such as 'family contributors' and 'persons not in employment, available for work but not seeking employment'. Non-comparability may also result from differences in the age limits used to measure the labour force (formerly known as the economically active population). Some countries have adopted non-standard upper age limits for inclusion in the workforce, with a cut-off point at 65 or 70, which affects broad comparisons, and in particular those of higher age levels. Finally, differences in the dates to which the data refer, as well as the method of calculating the annual average, may contribute to the non-comparability of the resulting statistics. To a large extent, these comparability issues have been addressed in the construction of ILO-modeled estimates of labour force participation rates included in ILOSTAT. Only data from household labour force surveys and population censuses representative of the whole country (without geographical limitations) were used to construct the estimates. In countries with more than one survey source, only one type of source was used. If a labour force survey was available for the country, labour force participation rates from this source were chosen in favour of those from population censuses. The imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for comparisons or rankings between countries. This series is based on the definitions of the thirteenth ICLS.
Women who perform the type of work defined as "subordinate work", in which the employed have explicit (written or oral) or implicit employment contracts that give them a basic wage that does not depend directly on the income of the unit for which they work.
Sources
ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST)
Methodology
Labour market indicators are estimated using a set of models that establish statistical relationships between the observed labour market indicators and the explanatory variables. Linear interpolation is used to fill in missing data for countries for which this procedure is possible. The countries are divided into nine esteem groups, chosen on the basis of broad economic similarity and geographical proximity. Based on the data structure and the heterogeneity between the countries covered by the input data, the model was specified using panel data with fixed effects per country. Regressions are weighted by the inverse of the probability of availability of a labour force survey. The explanatory variables used include economic and demographic variables. To produce the estimates for 2020, a cross-validation approach is used to select the model that minimizes the forecast error in that specific year.
Notes
For international comparisons of labour force data, the most comprehensive source is undoubtedly the LFS. However, despite their strength, LFS data may contain elements that are not comparable in terms of scope and coverage, mainly due to differences in the inclusion or exclusion of certain geographical areas and whether or not conscripts are included. In addition, there are variations in national definitions of the concept of labour force, in particular with regard to the statistical treatment of certain specific groups, such as 'family contributors' and 'persons not in employment, available for work but not seeking employment'. Non-comparability may also result from differences in the age limits used to measure the labour force (formerly known as the economically active population). Some countries have adopted non-standard upper age limits for inclusion in the workforce, with a cut-off point at 65 or 70, which affects broad comparisons, and in particular those of higher age levels. Finally, differences in the dates to which the data refer, as well as the method of calculating the annual average, may contribute to the non-comparability of the resulting statistics. To a large extent, these comparability issues have been addressed in the construction of ILO-modeled estimates of labour force participation rates included in ILOSTAT. Only data from household labour force surveys and population censuses representative of the whole country (without geographical limitations) were used to construct the estimates. In countries with more than one survey source, only one type of source was used. If a labour force survey was available for the country, labour force participation rates from this source were chosen in favour of those from population censuses. The imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for comparisons or rankings between countries. This series is based on the definitions of the thirteenth ICLS.
Men who perform the type of work defined as "subordinate work", in which the employed have explicit (written or oral) or implicit employment contracts that give them a basic wage that does not depend directly on the income of the unit for which they work.
Sources
ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST)
Methodology
Labour market indicators are estimated using a set of models that establish statistical relationships between the observed labour market indicators and the explanatory variables. Linear interpolation is used to fill in missing data for countries for which this procedure is possible. The countries are divided into nine esteem groups, chosen on the basis of broad economic similarity and geographical proximity. Based on the data structure and the heterogeneity between the countries covered by the input data, the model was specified using panel data with fixed effects per country. Regressions are weighted by the inverse of the probability of availability of a labour force survey. The explanatory variables used include economic and demographic variables. To produce the estimates for 2020, a cross-validation approach is used to select the model that minimizes the forecast error in that specific year.
Notes
For international comparisons of labour force data, the most comprehensive source is undoubtedly the LFS. However, despite their strength, LFS data may contain elements that are not comparable in terms of scope and coverage, mainly due to differences in the inclusion or exclusion of certain geographical areas and whether or not conscripts are included. In addition, there are variations in national definitions of the concept of labour force, in particular with regard to the statistical treatment of certain specific groups, such as 'family contributors' and 'persons not in employment, available for work but not seeking employment'. Non-comparability may also result from differences in the age limits used to measure the labour force (formerly known as the economically active population). Some countries have adopted non-standard upper age limits for inclusion in the workforce, with a cut-off point at 65 or 70, which affects broad comparisons, and in particular those of higher age levels. Finally, differences in the dates to which the data refer, as well as the method of calculating the annual average, may contribute to the non-comparability of the resulting statistics. To a large extent, these comparability issues have been addressed in the construction of ILO-modeled estimates of labour force participation rates included in ILOSTAT. Only data from household labour force surveys and population censuses representative of the whole country (without geographical limitations) were used to construct the estimates. In countries with more than one survey source, only one type of source was used. If a labour force survey was available for the country, labour force participation rates from this source were chosen in favour of those from population censuses. The imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for comparisons or rankings between countries. This series is based on the definitions of the thirteenth ICLS.
Share of the female workforce that does not have a job but is available and looking for a job.
Sources
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST); b) Istat for Italy
Methodology
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) - Labour market indicators are estimated using a set of models that establish statistical relationships between the observed labour market indicators and the explanatory variables. To fill in the missing data, linear interpolation is used for countries for which this procedure is possible. In all other cases, a weighted multivariate estimate is made. The countries are divided into nine esteem groups, chosen on the basis of broad economic similarity and geographical proximity. Given the structure of the data and the heterogeneity between the countries covered by the input data, the model was specified using panel data with fixed effects per country. Regressions are weighted by the inverse of the probability of availability of a labour force survey. The explanatory variables used include economic and demographic variables. To produce the estimates for 2020, a cross-validation approach is used to select the model that minimizes the forecast error in that specific year. b) Istat (for Italy) - The data are collected with the Labour Force Survey, a sample survey conducted through interviews with households; The main objective is to estimate the aggregates that make up the labour supply: employed and jobseekers.
Notes
The unemployed include all persons of working age who: (a) were not in employment during the reference period, i.e. were not in paid employment or self-employment; (b) were currently available for employment, i.e. were available for paid employment or self-employment during the reference period; (c) were looking for a job, i.e. had taken specific actions in a certain recent period to seek paid employment or self-employment. Future start-ups, i.e. people who have not looked for work but have a future interest in the labour market (have made arrangements for a future start of work), as well as participants in vocational training or retraining programmes as part of employment promotion programmes, who were not "employed" on this basis, are also counted as unemployed. they were not "currently available" and did not "look for work" because they had a job offer to start within a short subsequent period, generally no longer than three months. The unemployed also include "unemployed" people who have migrated abroad to work for pay or profit, but who were still waiting for the opportunity to leave. A country's overall unemployment rate is a widely used measure of unused labor supply. Unemployment rates for specific groups, defined by age, gender, occupation or industry, are also useful for identifying the groups of workers and sectors most vulnerable to unemployment.
Presence in policy-oriented statistical systems
SDG Goal 8, indicator 8.5.2; ENP-South Eurostat Data Browser: Population and Social Conditions Area
Share of the male workforce that does not have a job but is available and looking for a job.
Sources
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST); b) Istat for Italy
Methodology
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) - Labour market indicators are estimated using a set of models that establish statistical relationships between the observed labour market indicators and the explanatory variables. To fill in the missing data, linear interpolation is used for countries for which this procedure is possible. In all other cases, a weighted multivariate estimate is made. The countries are divided into nine esteem groups, chosen on the basis of broad economic similarity and geographical proximity. Given the structure of the data and the heterogeneity between the countries covered by the input data, the model was specified using panel data with fixed effects per country. Regressions are weighted by the inverse of the probability of availability of a labour force survey. The explanatory variables used include economic and demographic variables. To produce the estimates for 2020, a cross-validation approach is used to select the model that minimizes the forecast error in that specific year. b) Istat (for Italy) - The data are collected with the Labour Force Survey, a sample survey conducted through interviews with households; The main objective is to estimate the aggregates that make up the labour supply: employed and jobseekers.
Notes
The unemployed include all persons of working age who: (a) were not in employment during the reference period, i.e. were not in paid employment or self-employment; (b) were currently available for employment, i.e. were available for paid employment or self-employment during the reference period; (c) were looking for a job, i.e. had taken specific actions in a certain recent period to seek paid employment or self-employment. Future start-ups, i.e. people who have not looked for work but have a future interest in the labour market (have made arrangements for a future start of work), as well as participants in vocational training or retraining programmes as part of employment promotion programmes, who were not "employed" on this basis, are also counted as unemployed. they were not "currently available" and did not "look for work" because they had a job offer to start within a short subsequent period, generally no longer than three months. The unemployed also include "unemployed" people who have migrated abroad to work for pay or profit, but who were still waiting for the opportunity to leave. A country's overall unemployment rate is a widely used measure of unused labor supply. Unemployment rates for specific groups, defined by age, gender, occupation or industry, are also useful for identifying the groups of workers and sectors most vulnerable to unemployment.
Presence in policy-oriented statistical systems
SDG Goal 8, indicator 8.5.2; ENP-South Eurostat Data Browser: Population and Social Conditions Area
Percentage of a country's female population in the age group 15 years and over. Employment is defined as persons of working age who, during a short reporting period, have been engaged in any activity of producing goods or providing services for remuneration or profit, whether they were at work during the reporting period (i.e. worked at a workplace for at least one hour) or were not at work due to temporary absence from a post or agreements on working time. The age of 15 and over is generally considered the reference for the working-age population.
Sources
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST); b) Istat for Italy
Methodology
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) - Labour market indicators are estimated using a set of models that establish statistical relationships between the observed labour market indicators and the explanatory variables. To fill in the missing data, linear interpolation is used for countries for which this procedure is possible. In all other cases, a weighted multivariate estimate is made. The countries are divided into nine esteem groups, chosen on the basis of broad economic similarity and geographical proximity. Given the structure of the data and the heterogeneity between the countries covered by the input data, the model was specified using panel data with fixed effects per country. Regressions are weighted by the inverse of the probability of availability of a labour force survey. The explanatory variables used include economic and demographic variables. To produce the estimates for 2020, a cross-validation approach is used to select the model that minimizes the forecast error in that specific year. b) Istat (for Italy) - The data are collected with the Labour Force Survey, a sample survey conducted through interviews with households; The main objective is to estimate the aggregates that make up the labour supply: employed and jobseekers. b) Istat (for Italy) - The data are collected with the Labour Force Survey, a sample survey conducted through interviews with households; The main objective is to estimate the aggregates that make up the labour supply: employed and jobseekers.
Notes
For international comparisons of labour force data, the most comprehensive source is undoubtedly the LFS. However, despite their strength, LFS data may contain elements that are not comparable in terms of scope and coverage, mainly due to differences in the inclusion or exclusion of certain geographical areas and whether or not conscripts are included. In addition, there are variations in national definitions of the concept of labour force, in particular with regard to the statistical treatment of certain specific groups, such as 'family contributors' and 'persons not in employment, available for work but not seeking employment'. Non-comparability may also result from differences in the age limits used to measure the labour force (formerly known as the economically active population). Some countries have adopted non-standard upper age limits for inclusion in the workforce, with a cut-off point at 65 or 70, which affects broad comparisons, and in particular those of higher age levels. Finally, differences in the dates to which the data refer, as well as the method of calculating the annual average, may contribute to the non-comparability of the resulting statistics. To a large extent, these comparability issues have been addressed in the construction of ILO-modeled estimates of labour force participation rates included in ILOSTAT. Only data from household labour force surveys and population censuses representative of the whole country (without geographical limitations) were used to construct the estimates. In countries with more than one survey source, only one type of source was used. If a labour force survey was available for the country, labour force participation rates from this source were chosen in favour of those from population censuses. The imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for comparisons or rankings between countries. This series is based on the definitions of the thirteenth ICLS.
Percentage of the employed male population of a country in the age group 15 years and over. Employment is defined as persons of working age who, during a short reporting period, have been engaged in any activity of producing goods or providing services for remuneration or profit, whether they were at work during the reporting period (i.e. worked at a workplace for at least one hour) or were not at work due to temporary absence from a post or agreements on working time. The age of 15 and over is generally considered the reference for the working-age population.
Sources
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST); b) Istat for Italy
Methodology
a) ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) - Labour market indicators are estimated using a set of models that establish statistical relationships between the observed labour market indicators and the explanatory variables. To fill in the missing data, linear interpolation is used for countries for which this procedure is possible. In all other cases, a weighted multivariate estimate is made. The countries are divided into nine esteem groups, chosen on the basis of broad economic similarity and geographical proximity. Given the structure of the data and the heterogeneity between the countries covered by the input data, the model was specified using panel data with fixed effects per country. Regressions are weighted by the inverse of the probability of availability of a labour force survey. The explanatory variables used include economic and demographic variables. To produce the estimates for 2020, a cross-validation approach is used to select the model that minimizes the forecast error in that specific year. b) Istat (for Italy) - The data are collected with the Labour Force Survey, a sample survey conducted through interviews with households; The main objective is to estimate the aggregates that make up the labour supply: employed and jobseekers. b) Istat (for Italy) - The data are collected with the Labour Force Survey, a sample survey conducted through interviews with households; The main objective is to estimate the aggregates that make up the labour supply: employed and jobseekers.
Notes
For international comparisons of labour force data, the most comprehensive source is undoubtedly the LFS. However, despite their strength, LFS data may contain elements that are not comparable in terms of scope and coverage, mainly due to differences in the inclusion or exclusion of certain geographical areas and whether or not conscripts are included. In addition, there are variations in national definitions of the concept of labour force, in particular with regard to the statistical treatment of certain specific groups, such as 'family contributors' and 'persons not in employment, available for work but not seeking employment'. Non-comparability may also result from differences in the age limits used to measure the labour force (formerly known as the economically active population). Some countries have adopted non-standard upper age limits for inclusion in the workforce, with a cut-off point at 65 or 70, which affects broad comparisons, and in particular those of higher age levels. Finally, differences in the dates to which the data refer, as well as the method of calculating the annual average, may contribute to the non-comparability of the resulting statistics. To a large extent, these comparability issues have been addressed in the construction of ILO-modeled estimates of labour force participation rates included in ILOSTAT. Only data from household labour force surveys and population censuses representative of the whole country (without geographical limitations) were used to construct the estimates. In countries with more than one survey source, only one type of source was used. If a labour force survey was available for the country, labour force participation rates from this source were chosen in favour of those from population censuses. The imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for comparisons or rankings between countries. This series is based on the definitions of the thirteenth ICLS.